Moving to #1
by Julie Lancaster View Bio
Stepping Up to CEO or Executive Director, and Actually Leading
You worked hard to get here. You solved problems faster than anyone else, shipped results, and earned the trust of your organization. Then one day, someone handed you the top job, and everything changed. The skills that got you promoted are not the skills that will make you successful in the role. This is the most common and most dangerous trap facing new CEOs and Executive Directors.
This brief covers the top missteps made in the transition to the top seat, what it truly means to shift from doer to strategist, and a self-diagnostic quiz to help you assess whether you are spending your time on the right things.
PART 1: THE TOP MISSTEPS WHEN MOVING INTO THE #1 SEAT
Misstep 1: Continuing to Do the Work Instead of Leading It
The most pervasive failure pattern for newly promoted executives is remaining the best individual contributor in the room. You know how to do the work better than most of your team. So when something is moving too slowly, you step in. When a deliverable looks wrong, you rewrite it. It feels efficient. It is not.
Research from Harvard Business Review found a 50% chance that new executives leave their organization within the first 18 months, and overextension in operational details is a primary contributor. CEOs who remain stuck in execution mode deprive their direct reports of the growth and accountability they need, and they deprive the organization of the strategic leadership only the CEO can provide.
- The fix: Ask yourself daily, “Is this something only I can do?” If the answer is no, delegate it.
Misstep 2: Acting Too Fast Without Learning the System
New leaders, especially those hired from outside, often feel pressure to demonstrate value immediately. This leads to premature organizational changes, restructuring before trust is built, and decisions that destroy institutional knowledge. A Russell Reynolds Associates study of 178 global CEOs found that the first 90 days are commonly overemphasized. The top regret cited by new CEOs? Moving too slowly on executive team alignment, not strategic vision.
Ty Wiggins, author of The New CEO, notes that the first six months are best spent listening, learning, and avoiding major errors rather than making radical changes. Externally hired CEOs are 18% more likely to conduct sweeping organizational redesigns than their internally promoted peers, and not always to good effect.
- The fix: Spend the first 60–90 days in audit mode. Understand before you act.
Misstep 3: Underinvesting in Internal Stakeholders
New executives often focus outward, on investors, partners, and clients, while the internal audience quietly disengages. Even internally promoted CEOs fall into this trap. Employees who knew you as a peer need to see you in a new light. Teams that never worked with you directly need to be connected to your vision and values.
A McKinsey analysis found that when executives struggle through a transition, the performance of their direct reports is 15% lower than it would be with high-performing leadership, and those direct reports are 20% more likely to disengage or leave.
- The fix: Build a stakeholder map in your first 30 days. Prioritize internal communications, not just external presence.
Misstep 4: Failing to Build the Right Executive Team, Fast Enough
One of the most consistent findings across CEO transition research is that inherited leadership teams are rarely the right teams. Data from the Russell Reynolds CEO study showed it took an average of 2.8 months for a new CEO to make the first team change, and nearly 11–14 months before the team was considered high-performing. The longer poor fits remain, the more strategic capacity the CEO loses.
- The fix: Begin talent assessment in your first 30 days. Set a 90-day decision deadline on any role you are uncertain about.
THE BURNOUT REALITY AT THE TOP
71% of small to mid-size company CEOs report experiencing burnout at least occasionally. 32% experience it frequently or near-daily. (Vistage, 2024)
56% of all leaders reported burnout in 2024, up from 52% in 2023, with 43% of organizations losing at least half their leadership teams that year. (Superhuman/DDI Global Leadership Forecast)
82% of CEOs in a Deloitte study reported experiencing exhaustion indicative of burnout, and 96% said their mental health had declined since taking the role. (Inc./Deloitte, 2024)
Burnout at the executive level does not primarily come from working too many hours. It comes from working on the wrong things at too high a volume. CEOs who are chronically in execution mode, resolving the problems that their team should be solving, carry a cognitive and emotional load that compounds over time. The antidote is not working less. It is working strategically.
PART 2: STRATEGIST, NOT DOER, THE FUNDAMENTAL SHIFT
The transition to CEO or Executive Director is not just a promotion; it is a role change. The job description, the success metrics, and the daily activities required to be effective are fundamentally different from any role that came before it.
What “Being a Strategist” Actually Means
Strategic work is thinking that creates future value: direction-setting, system-building, resource allocation, and organizational design. Operational work is delivery work that creates immediate value: solving today’s problems, reviewing outputs, and managing execution.
Research on CEO time allocation shows that top-performing CEOs at mature organizations spend 60% or more of their time on future-oriented strategy. Yet on average, CEOs spend only about 15% of their time alone doing deep thinking and analysis, with 59% of that solo time fragmented into blocks of one hour or less. Most of the rest is consumed by meetings and reactive communications.
How CEOs Actually Spend Their Time (vs. How They Should)
| Activity | Average CEO | High Performer |
| Strategy & Vision | ~15% | ~21–30% |
| Meetings (internal) | ~60% | ~40% (structured) |
| Deep solo work/thinking | ~15% | Protected blocks daily |
| External stakeholders | ~25% | ~25–30% |
| Operational/reactive work | ~35–40% | <20% |
Sources: Harvard Business School CEO Time Study (Porter & Nohria); The CEO Project; ProAssisting; Yale SME CEO Study
The Delegation Imperative
Delegation is not about trust; it is about architecture. If you are the decision node for every meaningful question in your organization, you have not built a leadership structure; you have built a bottleneck with a title.
Research suggests that CEOs who delegate intentionally and design their schedules around strategic priorities reduce reactive work by 20–40%. The rule of thumb: if someone else on your team can accomplish the task at 80% of your quality, delegate it, and invest the saved time on the 20% only you can do.
- List every recurring task and decision you made this month. For each one, ask: Could this have been done by someone else? Should it have been?
- If the list of “only I can do this” items is longer than 5–7 things per week, you are operating in execution mode, not leadership mode.
PART 3: ARE YOU FOCUSED ON THE RIGHT THINGS?
Before you read the questions below, take 15 minutes and do this: list every role, project, responsibility, and recurring task that currently sits on your plate, whether formally assigned to you or not. Then audit how you spent your time last month. These two lists are your diagnosis.
The #1 Focus Quiz, 8 Diagnostic Questions
These are not trick questions. They are calibration questions. Answer honestly, not how you think a CEO should answer, but how you actually operate right now.
| Q1. Do you spend at least 2 focused hours per week on strategy, not planning next week’s tasks, but on the direction, model, and future of the organization? |
| Q2. In the last 30 days, did you personally execute a task that someone on your team could have done at 80%+ quality? How many times? |
| Q3. Can your team make meaningful decisions and keep moving without your direct input? Or do key things stall when you are unavailable? |
| Q4. Do you have a written list of the 3–5 things only you can do in your role as CEO? Are you spending the majority of your week on those things? |
| Q5. When you look at your calendar from last month, does the time you spent match your stated top priorities, or does it reflect whoever had the most urgent request? |
| Q6. Do you have protected blocks of uninterrupted time for deep work, thinking, or strategic planning? Are those blocks actually protected from meetings and notifications? |
| Q7. When your team brings you a problem, do you primarily solve it for them, or do you primarily develop their capacity to solve it themselves? |
| Q8. Are you currently carrying responsibilities or decisions that belong in another seat on your org chart, because that seat is not filled, not performing, or because it is simply faster if you do it yourself? |
HOW TO USE YOUR ANSWERS
If you answered “yes” to Q1 and Q4 but “yes” to Q2 and Q8, you have a delegation and structure gap, not a strategy gap. You know what you should be doing; your organization is not yet built to let you do it.
If you answered “no” to Q3 and Q5, you have a calendar and culture problem. Your team looks to you for decisions they should be empowered to make, and your time is being consumed reactively rather than by design.
The goal is not perfection; it is awareness. Most new CEOs and EDs are doing real work, just too much of the wrong kind of work for the role they now hold.
PART 4: THE 30-DAY RESET THREE MOVES
Move 1: The Role Audit: List every role, project, and recurring duty currently on your plate, including informal ones you have absorbed over time. Categorize each item as: (A) Only I can do this, (B) Someone on my team should do this, or (C) This should not exist at all. Anything in column B gets assigned this week.
Move 2: The Calendar Audit: Pull up last month’s calendar. Categorize every block of time as strategic (building the future), operational (running today), or reactive (responding to others’ needs). If your strategic time is below 20%, you have identified your problem. Protect at least two 90-minute blocks per week for deep strategic work, no meetings, no Slack, no exceptions.
Move 3: The Delegation Decision: Identify three things you are currently doing that belong in another role. Either assign them this week, or acknowledge that the absence of that seat on your team is costing you leadership capacity, and address the structure. Working more hours is not the answer. Designing a team and calendar that lets you lead is.
MORE BLOG POSTS
What Makes You Truly Unique?
Recognizing Uniqueness I was 21. It was my first summer working with Visions Service Adventures, and we were making the 6-hour drive from Anchorage, Alaska, to Tok, a tiny town …
The 4 Secrets to Engaging Risk-Taking
http://www.lancasterleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Webinar-Risk-Taking-w-audio.m4a


